Image: Judge grants delay in Jackson guardianship case      (AP)
109 Votes

Avatar foranonymous

First buzzed by: anonymous

Judge grants delay in Jackson guardianship case (AP)

AP - Michael Jackson's mother and ex-wife will have time to reach an agreement over who will take care of the singer's three children. » Full Story on Yahoo! News

the children should stay with their family. debbie rowe is NOT family, she is a seller.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+8
Reply
Lee

Ditto that, Diva. I had heard that she was stated as saying she did not want the kids during an interview with People Weekly magazine, a few yrs back. She's (probably) just after any inheritance that they might get. I'm pretty sure that the children don't know her that well, either. Rowe really needs to drop the subject, move on, & let the children stay with the Jacksons.......I'm guessing they're happy where they are.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+5
Reply

I'm not saying that Debbie Rowe should get the children. But I am concerned over recent comments by Joe Jackson that seem to indicate that he is having a part in taking care of the children. The judge should have ordered Katherine Jackson to not allow Joe Jackson to have a say in what happens to the children. Michael, in his will, that his mother was first choice to care for the children, not her and her husband.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+6
Reply

You have to hope these children aren't divided according to DNA and sent to different blood relatives. Worse yet, sent into another disaster with Joe. The mother is advanced in age and will need to employ care for them before too much longer since the aunts and uncles haven't made an effort to take them in. Disaster after disaster and these children have no choices at the moment.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+7
Reply

It would be RIDICULOUS for Debbie Rowe to want custody of those children for any maternal reasons. *If* she cares at all about the children she'll leave well enough alone. If she goes for custody it will only be about the "Almighty $$$" which she already agreed to years ago. Leave it alone Debbie, please.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+5
Reply

Rowe is a piece of crap. How dare she sell her rights to her own flesh and blood then demand to be in their lives because she might get a pay out again? These children are copping with the loss of their father. Now some greedy bitch wants to rip apart their life some more.Who knows how long its been since they laid eyes on her. If she ever cared about those children she'd back off and wait until they are done grieving. Then slowly let them get to know her and then try to see about living arrangements. Besides most judges will try to find away to keep all the kids together they usually don't like to take siblings away from one another and as we all know she is not the mother of all 3 children.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+7
Reply
VJA

It's all about money. Rowe sold her kids once, then was taking jackson back to court for custody, was paid off again. Now she will get more money and the kids will stay with mjs mom. Rowe is a disgrace.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+3
Reply

No, don't let the children go to their "mom". Give them to Janet or another "stable" adult. It would be awful to seperate the 3 and Ms. Rowe doesn't see she wants the older 2... I feel so bad for these kids.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+4
Reply

Don't care and don't want to know.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
-4
Reply

Leave the children with the family they know and that is the Jackson family. It's more than obvious that they all love each other.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+6
Reply

Personally, with the debt that Michael left behind, it might be better for Debbie to have the 3 children not just her 2...she did get 8 million...it isn't good to separate the kids..however,,,if they do stay with Katherine, MJ's mom, I think Debbie should be allowed to bond with the kids..after all, she is their real mother and the kids need someone now...Debbie spoke highly of MJ and I think she has a good head on her shoulders...yes, she was paid off but I think she always looked out for them...

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+6
Reply

I think these kids should be distanced from anything Jackson as far as
possible. Maybe then they can experience a saner if not perfect
environment.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+1
Reply

Why not just share the custody? Children stay with Jackson family that they know and grew up with and Debbie Rowe have visitation to get to know her kids.
I'm am sure this will throw the Media for a loop!

Michael will be pleased and so will his children. END OF STORY

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+5
Reply

I am from the caribbean and what I notice in the United States of America is that most of these women over here are very money hungry and treat thier men very bad especially most of the African American women they only want the men for there money and then they have kids for the men to tie the men on them and they use the children as pawns and when the men get tired of it and wants to leave they lie on them and have them thrown in jail african american women 80% of them dont know how to love their men and they cannot even cook or keep a good house and dont like to work and most of them are not educated and they are very ignorant, you are suppose to respect your men where I am from in the caribbean you have to provde your man his three meals a day keep is house very tidy even if you work when he comes home he just shower and relax
Debbie Rowe she is one perfect example of only wanting the man for his money she did not love micheal she loved his money so she spread her cheap legs

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
-2
Reply

Keep the children away from Joe Jackson PLEASE!!!!!

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+4
Reply

Debbie Rowe is not a socialite, just a regular girl who was best friend , lover and mother of two of Michael's beautiful angels. She never did and never will betray Michael because she loves and cares about him deeply.
I don't blame her for wanting to just lead a regular life at all. She did not get paid off, Michael took care of her like the man he is and should because she will always have a bond with him for mothering his children. Just because they divorced did not mean that they were not in contact with each other.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+5
Reply

They didn't have the traditional marriage or divorce that most of the public livesto see a couple marries, fight like cats and dogs over stupid things, hurt each other, divorce and then the women take the man of her child for everything he's got and to boot, spends a life turning the children against the parent and in many cases, tries and keep the father from seeing and being with his children. Some go as far as to faulsely accuse eacch other to gan custody. Yet, noone seems to be bothered by this TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE or TRADITIONAL DIVORCE.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+2
Reply

Debbie Rowe is one example of someone who loved the man she gave the gift of life to and who took joy in knowing that the man who she choose to father her children would show her children love, affection and adoration always. Her kids will come to love their mother because they share the loving bond that they each had with Michael J Jackson when he was alive. Nothing sad about this at all, and I think the Jackson family have no problem with this either. It is the Media and the nosey public that can't recognize anything that is good.
And just so I don't leave anything out......Blanket has his fathers eyes and is just as sweet an angel.....I wish them all a big warm hug and will be looking forward to watching them grow up to be the best that God intended them to be.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+3
Reply

I think Debbie Rowe should butt out like she has done for the last years and maybe let one of the younger more stable Jackson family member's keep all the children; Together, and close contact with grandma Jackson... That way at lest Michael wish was half way met. The mother is elderly, and young kids may tire her out some. Just a thought on this post.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+3
Reply

Have you forgotten how large a family the Jackson's are. I think the kids will be just fine with aunts, uncles, cousins. All the Jacksons in this family sing, Paris wants to be a singer and dancer like her father and so does her brother and they most definitely have have there fathers genes to do that and the Jackson family to support them 100% in this. Don't carry on the media hype on Debbie Rowe, a person you know nothing about just like you knew nothing about Michael and everything he truly was until after he dies and the Media need to boost there ratings and decides to tell the truth about this man. I'm am sure if you were walking in theirs shoes you wouldn't not like being followed around by parasites either.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+1
Reply

Have you forgotten how large a family the Jackson's are. I think the kids will be just fine with aunts, uncles, cousins. All the Jacksons in this family sing, Paris wants to be a singer and dancer like her father and so does her brother and they most definitely have have there fathers genes to do that and the Jackson family to support them 100% in this. Don't carry on the media hype on Debbie Rowe, a person you know nothing about just like you knew nothing about Michael and everything he truly was until after he dies and the Media need to boost there ratings and decides to tell the truth about this man. I'm am sure if you were walking in theirs shoes you wouldn't like being followed around by the parasites we have as media. They know which ones they are.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+1
Reply

Hi Bewitched, I guess what I also was implying was the reading of the wish's of M J (asking that his Mom ONLY have the care of children ; in so many words) Then the question that runs through my mind is: Why place the children in a home which is be shared with the Joe/ her husband?
Therefore if the children are placed with other members than those two (Debbie, or Joe) It's what MJ wish's were and met. This was my thought too. BTW: You did make a good point- Thank you

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+2
Reply

i think the children should stay with the jackson family because that i think is best for them and it was apparentely MJ S wish but i hope dont end up with scum bad Joe

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
0
Reply

bewitched. you are definitely the voice of reason. so very refreshing on the yahoo boards. i agree with you. additionally, blanket does have michael's eyes. i told my husband and he just pfft'd me. i think the oldest boy has his eyes too.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
+1
Reply

This B is a PIG!!!. She just want more money.

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
-3
Reply

Doesn't the smell of money just do wonders for love? The court delays are the time needed to dig up dirt on the parties involved and the mud slinging will begin............

posted Jul 11, 2009 |
0
Reply

This is truly sad that the kids were put in this position. What the hell was this guy, MJ, thinking? It surly wasn't about the welfare of his kids.

posted Jul 12, 2009 |
+2
Reply

Any woman that give up her rights for her kids. and takes money to not have anything to do with them. Sure as hell dont need then now. Leave them with the Jackson. Just leave the kids alone. There suffering enough.

posted Jul 12, 2009 |
+2
Reply
Lee

Who decided to have the hearings, right away, instead of waiting 3wks/month(to give the family time to grieve)anyway?

posted Jul 12, 2009 |
0
Reply

Please if there be god let him take those childrren far away from the perverted family known as the Jackson's. Can you image that trash LaToya ever being a part of raising them and even being in their lives. You took them from the child molestor now please take them from the ones who raised the child molestor and get them a good home with their NANNY!

posted Jul 12, 2009 |
-1
Reply
See 2 more comments
Post Comment

Want to post a comment?

Just sign in and you'll be good to go

New User? Sign Up | Sign In